Communication: new case No. 0034 of 2022

IDENTIFIER
62022CN0034
LANGUAGE
English
COURT
Court of Justice of the European Union
AG OPINION
NO
REFERENCES MADE
0
REFERENCED
0
DOCUMENT TYPE
Communication: new case

Judgment



30.5.2022   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/21


Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg Oost-Vlaanderen, Afdeling Gent (Belgium) lodged on 17 January 2022 — VN v Belgische Staat

(Case C-34/22)

(2022/C 213/28)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg Oost-Vlaanderen, Afdeling Gent

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: VN

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Question referred

Does Article 21(1)(5) of the ITC 1992, as amended by Article 170 of the Law of 25 April 2014 on various provisions, infringe the provisions of Articles 56 and 63 TFEU and Articles 36 and 40 of the EEA Agreement, in that the provision in question, although it applies without distinction to domestic and foreign service providers, not only requires compliance with conditions analogous to those set out in Article 2 RD/ITC 1992, which are de facto specific to the Belgian market, but also requires, first of all, that such analogous requirements be laid down by the public authorities in the EEA State concerned, thus going beyond local prudential supervision and falling instead within the scope of the deposit guarantee scheme pursuant to Directive No 94/19/EC, [thereby] seriously imped[ing] foreign service providers from offering their services in Belgium? (1)


(1)  Directive 94/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on deposit-guarantee schemes (OJ 1994 L 135, p. 5).



Citations

Sign up for a free moonlit.ai™ account to access all citing documents.