Communication: order No. 0460 of 2021

IDENTIFIER
62021CB0460
LANGUAGE
English
COURT
Court of Justice of the European Union
AG OPINION
NO
REFERENCES MADE
1
REFERENCED
1
DOCUMENT TYPE
Communication: order

Judgment



28.3.2022   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/5


Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 February 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) — Portugal) — Vapo Atlantic SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

(Case C-460/21) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Excise duties - Directive 2008/118/EC - Article 1(2) - Levying, for specific purposes, of other indirect taxes - ‘Specific purposes’ - Definition - Financing of a public undertaking holding the concession contract in respect of the national road network - Objectives of environmental sustainability and reducing accidents - Purely budgetary purpose - Refusal to reimburse a tax based on unjust enrichment - Conditions)

(2022/C 138/05)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vapo Atlantic SA

Defendant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Operative part of the order

By order of the Court of 7 February 2022, the Court (Eighth Chamber) rules:

1.

Article 1(2) of Council Directive 2008/118/EC of 16 December 2008 concerning the general arrangements for excise duty and repealing Directive 92/12/EEC must be interpreted as meaning that a charge, the revenue from which is allocated, in a generic manner, to a public undertaking holding the concession contract for the national road network and the structure of that charge does not indicate an intention to discourage the consumption of the main road fuels, does not pursue ‘specific purposes’ within the meaning of that provision.

2.

EU law must be interpreted as precluding national authorities from being able to justify their refusal to reimburse an indirect charge that is contrary to Directive 2008/118 by assuming that that charge has been passed on to third parties and, as a result, that the taxable person has been unjustly enriched.


(1)  Date lodged: 26/7/2021.



Citations

Sign up for a free moonlit.ai™ account to access all citing documents.